Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Enoch Lambert's avatar

Seems like your theory needs to explain why there wasn’t a whole lot more agriculture or why the myths led to agriculture such a small percentage of the time

Randy Gazda's avatar

I agree with you on the timing issue, the problem of “independent invention,” and the idea that cultural substrates travel farther than academics admit. But I’m thinking that rather than a cult, the emersion could have been the result of a coherence threshold. Once environmental stability, population density, and stored knowledge aligned, agriculture activated wherever that threshold was crossed. I admit that I'd like to think of myth as motivation, though!

No posts

Ready for more?